14:56 < snappieT> why is the most recent page of QDB almost exclusively me :D:

11:21 <@nosmo> "why do $group" is great of suggest
11:21 <@nosmo> "why do atheists hate america" etc 
11:21 < pfarrel> why do life-dolers
11:22 < snappieT> would like a less-offensive (terse) collective term for that group though...
11:22 < kopf> SPONGERS
11:23 <@nosmo> sub-human socialist-voters 
11:24 < WEH> messers 
11:24 < kopf> GOUGERS
11:24 < WEH> chicken fillet roll gobbling, no voting, hat wearing, messers
11:25 < spoon> trackies
11:25 < snappieT> I was going to go with 'eternal beneficiaries', but all good ideas
11:25 <@nosmo> eternal beneficiaries is a great PD term, I think you should stick with it

11:09 < snappieT> Want to be careful how I say this... The "life-doler" is something very real (at least in Finglas/Coolock/Darndale/Artane)

10:49 < snappieT> pfarrel: every person who reads [the Metro], who tend to be people going to work for 9am, and not life-dolers
10:49 < pfarrel> Do you know that most people start work at 9am
10:49 < pfarrel> And that very few people are life-dolers
10:49 < pfarrel> And that being a life-doler has nothing got to do with what I talk about
10:49 < WEH> so if you have a job you must not be capable of being a person with shitty opinions?
10:50 < snappieT> less likely
10:50 < kopf> and that life-dolers don't have a monopoly on ignorance
10:50 <@johnl> What has this got to do with "life-dolers"?
10:50 < kopf> johnl: exactly
10:50 < kopf> what the fuck is that about snappieT?
10:50 < WEH> I think snappiet is oiling up his bike for some serious back-pedalling
10:51 < pfarrel> :DDDDDDDD

10:51 < snappieT> Wouldn't you agree that people without jobs or working non-9/10am-start hours (say, retail) are more likely to read the red tops?